L'amère “pilule” Straw a du mal à passer

Dans la tension très forte existant aujourd’hui entre Londres (Tony Blair mis à part) et Washington, on revient beaucoup dans la presse britannique sur le limogeage de Jack Straw en avril. La version d’une intervention de Washington est désormais communément admise.

Il est significatif qu’un commentateur aussi conservateur que William Rees-Mogg, dans le Times du 7 août, s’attarde en détails sur le cas, avec des phrases qui ne laissent guère de doutes sur les sentiments généraux entourant cette affaire (« That confirms that the Foreign Secretary was effectively dismissed by an American President. »). Tout cela reste complètement d’actualité, également parce que Straw a pris une position publique hostile à l’action israélienne, — contre la position du Premier ministre.

Rees-Mogg rapporte les diverses versions quant aux modalités de l’intervention des Américains.

« …I made inquiries in Washington and was told that Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary, had taken exception to Mr Straw’s statement that it would be “nuts” to bomb Iran. The United States, it was said, had put pressure on Tony Blair to change his Foreign Secretary. Mr Straw had been fired at the request of the Bush Administration, particularly at the Pentagon.

» Shortly before he was dismissed, Mr Straw went on his charming tour with Condoleezza Rice, in which they visited his Blackburn constituency. This had been given two explanations. One was that the US Secretary of State was hoping to protect Mr Straw, as a fellow foreign minister, against the undiplomatic attack from the Pentagon. She wanted to keep Mr Rumsfeld’s tanks off her turf. She had found Mr Straw competent and effective. If that were so, Dr Rice lost that battle in the Washington turf war.

» The alternative explanation was more recently given by Irwin Stelzer in The Spectator; he has remarkably good Washington contacts and is probably right. His account is that Mr Straw was indeed dismissed because of American anxieties, but that Dr Rice herself had become worried, on her visit to Blackburn, by Mr Straw’s dependence on Muslim votes. About 20 per cent of the voters in Blackburn are Islamic; Mr Straw was dismissed only four weeks after Dr Rice’s visit to his constituency. It may be that both explanations are correct. The first complaint may have been made by Mr Rumsfeld because of Iran; Dr Rice may have withdrawn her support after seeing the Islamic pressures in Blackburn. At any rate, Irwin Stelzer’s account confirms that Mr Straw was fired because of American pressure.

» Yesterday the Mail on Sunday went back for a second look at the story in the light of subsequent events, particularly the Israeli counter-attack on Lebanon. A US source told them that “Mr Straw’s views did not find favour in the White House and its concerns were passed on to the British Government”. »

Mis en ligne le 8 août 2006 à 10H33