Après l’UE, que vive l’UAN

Brèves de crise

   Forum

Il n'y a pas de commentaires associés a cet article. Vous pouvez réagir.

   Imprimer

 791

Après l’UE, que vive l’UAN

Certes, ce n’est pas la première fois qu’un président mexicain propose la chose à ses deux partenaires nord-américains, mais cette fois la proposition dispose d’une actualité considérable pour l’éclairer, et c’est d’ailleurs à cette actualité qu’elle se réfère. Le président mexicain Enrique Pena Nieto annonce effectivement qu’il va proposer dans la réunion continentale d’aujourd’hui à Ottawa, à ses partenaires nord-américains USA et Canada, une union de type UE (UAN pour Union de l’Amérique du Nord) pour les trois pays du continent nord-américain. L’affaire est annoncée par Infowars.com le 28 juin, avec des commentaires particulièrement critiques bien entendu.

Il n’est pas assuré que cette proposition soit jugée opportune par l’administration Obama dans l’actualité US aujourd’hui, dans la mesure où elle risque fort d’apporter des arguments à la rhétorique anti-globalisatrice de Trump, autant qu’à ses prises de position extrêmes contre l’immigration. L’article donne rapidement divers détails sur les effets de déplacement de population, essentiellement du Mexique vers les USA, obtenus par le premier accord de libre-échange NAFTA des années 1990. Une UAN constituerait, dans ce domaine, un super-NAFTA et achèverait de transformer complètement les USA à tous les points de vue sociaux et psychologiques essentiels, en plus des bouleversements divers que tout cela apporterait au principe de la souveraineté.

« In response to Brexit, Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto is calling for a EU-style “North American Union.” Nieto is attending a North American leaders summit in Ottawa on Wednesday to push the years-long, globalist proposal that would combine the U.S., Mexico and Canada into a regional entity at the expense of U.S. national sovereignty, which starts with joint energy agreements. 
“The purpose of this visit is to renew our bilateral relationship, to give it new life, to find ways to advance the prosperity and competitiveness of North America,” Nieto said, with emphasis added on North America.

» He’s not the first Mexican president to push the NAU; Vicente Fox also pushed the globalist plan, but he was so vocal about it, the Bush administration finally told him to keep quiet to avoid negative press. “I proposed a ‘NAFTA Plus’ plan to President Bush and Canada’s Prime Minister Jean Chrétien to move us toward a single continental economic union, modeled on the European example,” he wrote in his autobiography Revolution of Hope. “…At summits I took every opportunity to advocate clearly for free-market policies; showing what sound economics could do to fund social justice; arguing for globalism, NAFTA and the Free Trade Area of the Americas.”

» And during Fox’s presidency, in 2005, the globalist Council on Foreign Relations met with the Mexican government to discuss the implementation of the NAU.  “We are asking the leaders of the United States, Mexico, and Canada to be bold and adopt a vision of the future that is bigger than, and beyond, the immediate problems of the present,” CFR member and former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister John P. Manley wrote. “They could be the architects of a new community of North America, not mere custodians of the status quo.”

» However, the NAU proposal would “increased labor mobility” between the U.S. and Mexico, which would effectively grant amnesty to illegal immigrants, and a “North American regulatory plan” with a “unified approach” to all three countries, which would effectively end U.S. national sovereignty.Additionally, the NAU would strengthen controversial trade deals such as NAFTA which has only exacerbated illegal immigration by fueling mass unemployment in Mexico.

» “There are no jobs [in Mexico] and NAFTA forced the price of corn so low that it’s not economically possible to plant a crop anymore,” Rufino Domínguez, the former coordinator of the Binational Front of Indigenous Organizations, revealed. “We come to the U.S. to work because we can’t get a price for our product at home. There’s no alternative.” [...] That resulted in the mass migration of Mexican farm workers flowing into America. “The big wave in illegal immigration from Mexico began in the 1980s, but it picked up strongly after NAFTA – that wasn’t unexpected,” NPR’s Tim Robbins reported, a rare admission from an establishment outlet. »

 

Mis en ligne le 29 juin 2016 à 11H04

Donations

Nous avons récolté 1425 € sur 3000 €

faites un don