Forum

Les coups d’Etat que certains lobbies des USA fomentent au nom de leur pays sont conçus comme des reality-shows.
La révolution des Roses, comme les autres révolutions de couleur donnent envie de pleurer sur l’abrutissement des peuples, car les marionnettes choisies pour les incarner puent la mafia de M6 et le tenancier de maison close de TF1 à des milliers de kilomètres.

Pourquoi aller si loin chercher la honte ? Nous avons le(s) même(s) à la maison.

Jadis, la réaction à ces viols des peuples et des nations était raide car le script n’était pas si bien au point et les esprits pas encore aussi profondément pervertis par la fabrique de zombies d’Holywood.

Rubén Fulgencio Batista y Zaldívar, fils de prolétaire, maquereau, assassin, touchait sa dîme de la mafia des Etats Unis et de ses parrains -notablement Meyer Lansky- qui avaient transformé en bordel cette colonie martyre.

Aujourd’hui, Lansky s’appelle Goldman, Madoff ou Sachs mais il y a quelque chose qui déraille dans la boutique.
Dedefensa est utile car de temps à autre il nous parle du pourissement interne de la maison-mère et de ses conséquences sur le comportement de ses pantins de succursale, ces derniers se croyant parfois autorisés à s’inventer des destins personnels en marge du scénario concocté pour eux.

La fin de Batista en cavale ressemblait à celle d’un homme de paille du noir et blanc.
Saakachvili aura le destin d’un homme de main de série TV.

A propos du Honduras, des USA, de BHO, regardez donc la derniere note d’Immanuel Wallerstein:
Commentary No. 261, July 15, 2009
“The Right Strikes Back!”  http://fbc.binghamton.edu/261en.htm 

The presidency of George W. Bush was the moment of the greatest electoral sweep of left-of-center political parties in Latin America in the last two centuries. The presidency of Barack Obama risks being the moment of the revenge of the right in Latin America.
..........................
It seems quite clear that the last thing the Obama administration wanted was this coup. The coup has been an attempt to force Obama’s hand. This was undoubtedly encouraged by key figures in the U.S. right like Otto Reich, the Cuban-American ex-counselor of Bush, and the International Republican Institute. This was akin to Saakashvili’s attempt to force the U.S. hand in Georgia when he invaded South Ossetia. That too was done in connivance with the U.S. right. That one didn’t work because Russian troops stopped it.

Obama has been wiggling ever since the Honduran coup. And as of now the Honduran and U.S. right are far from satisfied that they have succeeded in turning U.S. policy around. Witness some of their outrageous statements. The Foreign Minister of the coup government, Enrique Ortez, said that Obama was “un negrito que sabe nada de nada.” There is some controversy about how pejorative “negrito” is in Spanish. I would translate this myself as saying that Obama was “a nigger who knows absolutely nothing.” In any case, the U.S. Ambassador sharply protested the insult. Ortez apologized for his “unfortunate expression” and he was shifted to another job in the government. Ortez also gave an interview to a Honduran TV station saying that “I don’t have racial prejudices; I like the sugar-mill nigger who is president of the United States.”
............................
The Honduran coup has to be placed in the larger context of what is happening throughout Latin America. It is quite possible that the right will win the elections this year and next year in Argentina and Brazil, maybe in Uruguay as well, and most likely in Chile…......................
The weak economic policies of Presidents Lula, Vazquez, Kirchner, and Bachelet (of Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina, and Chile) have strengthened the right (which he sees adopting a Berlusconi style) and split the left.

Myself, I think there’s a more straightforward explanation. The left came to power in Latin America because of U.S. distraction and good economic times. Now it faces continued distraction but bad economic times.
.................................
Can the United States do something more about the coup? Well, of course it can. First of all, Obama can officially label the coup a coup. This would trigger a U.S. law, cutting off all U.S. assistance to Honduras. He can sever the Pentagon’s continuing relations with the Honduran military. He can withdraw the U.S. ambassador. He can say that there’s nothing to negotiate instead of insisting on “mediation” between the legitimate government and the coup leaders.

Why doesn’t he do all that? It’s really simple, too. He’s got at least four other super-urgent items on his agenda: confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court; a continuing mess in the Middle East; his need to pass health legislation this year (if not by August, then by December); and suddenly enormous pressure to open investigations of the illegal acts of the Bush administration. I’m sorry, but Honduras is fifth in line,
So Obama wiggles. And nobody will be happy. Zelaya may yet be restored to legal office, but maybe only three months from now. Too late. Keep your eye on Guatemala.
by Immanuel Wallerstein

Et les autres ici:  http://fbc.binghamton.edu/eng2009.htm
————————————
Commentaries in English, 2009

248. “Cuba is Back!” Jan. 1, 2009

249. “Chronicle of a Suicide Foretold: The Case of Israel” Jan. 15, 2009

250. “Remaking America: The Ambiguities of Obama” Feb. 1, 2009

251. “The Politics of Economic Disaster” Feb. 15, 2009

252. “Guadeloupe: Obscure Key to World Crisis” Mar. 1, 2009

253. “Civil War in the United States?” Mar. 15, 2009

254. “Af-Pak: Obama’s War” Apr. 1, 2009

255. “What Was the Point of the G-20 Meeting?” Apr. 15, 2009

256. “Cuba and the United States: The Slow Thaw” May 1, 2009

257. “The Sinking Dollar” May 15, 2009

258. “Obama versus Cheney, Center versus Right” June 1, 2009

259. “What Kind of Two-State Solution?” June 15, 2009

260. “Obama’s Very Limited Options” July 1, 2009

261. “The Right Strikes Back!” July 15, 2009
——————-